“Lord grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
the courage to change the things I can, and
the wisdom to know the difference” -St. Francis of Assissi
So this is the way the world works according to what I’ve seen…
I often get called Dr. Marcus or Dr. Marc, which is sort of what prompted this whole whole thing. However, along the way it’s been Sucram, Dr. Roddy, roddylaves, Survivor Marcus, Tata McShibby, Marc, Guy LeDouche, jerk, genius, idiot, Neji, arrogant a–hole, Cosmo’s Georgia Bachelor of the Year ‘06 (holla!), Marcus Aurelius, Macho man, etc. It short, you name it, I’ve been called it. And in the spirit of calling things like they are, ought to be, could be, should be, would be and might even be, I’ll lay it out just as plain, from my brain to the pixel pages you’re absorbing through those optic tracts of yours…
Thanks, Noah–former college roommate, current internet guru and long distance event master. He intended for this to be a site specifically directed at health and wellness through personal responsibility and self-awareness. He wants me to harness my continual attempts to inspire and direct us toward the real solution to the “healthcare crisis” into something that people can get to easily. It’s all in the hope that pushing for wise decisions reduces the fear, pain, and hurt–the things I see on the faces of those who suffer setbacks in their health. May we find a way to harness our innate power to know and improve our own health.
We will ever see how much we can do to be healthy? Do we as individuals have the ability to maximize the genetic and environmental “gift basket” that has us wherever we are in this moment? Whether I’m six feet tall, with a lean figure, or five feet five inches tall and “pudged out,” am I doing what I can to maximize my health?
I may be skinny, but it doesn’t necessarily make me healthy. I may may on the chunk, but it doesn’t make me necessarily unhealthy, either. Starting from this point, it’s my decisions that mold my raw materials into the best that they can be.
What does it matter?
Well, as the anthropology-major-turned-MD, observation is key. I think the scope of one’s observations can make something seem healthy, and occasionally vice versa. For example, if I consider just the next 30 minutes, a double cheeseburger is delightful in my belly and easy on my budget this month, but pan out to 20 years…how much is that heart attack costing me in hospital bills and early retirement? With a short term scope it makes sense, while in the long term one the same reasons in made sense in the short term no longer hold.
Then again, what if I’ve spent the entire week training for a half-Ironman and this cheeseburger is to celebrate my best friend’s birthday and get some well earned emotional and psychological fulfillment? Overall, it may seem like a confusing picture, but it’s not. It’s a mixed bag of positives and negatives as we can see, but if I know myself and this latter circumstance is the case, then I can say that I’m trying to seek the balance between my emotional and psychological health and my physical health. I’m more likely to get there by considering my decisions along these lines.
Now pan out from me, the individual, to society. Assuming I don’t take the time to think through my daily decisions, I just rock the DC’s whenever the mood strikes. I start having health consequences. It requires that I consume healthcare: doctor’s time, tests, medicines, etc. The health care delivered to me because of my genetics-turned-ugly-thanks-to-Mickey-D’s-double-squeezers doesn’t go to other people that might have benefited: a kid who needs a vaccine, or a car accident victim who needs emergency surgery. (Naturally, we’re assuming a limited resource. Do you know of anything that exists in infinite quantities?)
So if we change the scope of time, we see different characteristics of my decisions. Now, having changed the scope from personal focus to society we see different implications for my decisions. Not only does my decision to maximize or minimize my health affect me, it affects others!
Let focus in on ourselves again, since that’s human nature when things go wrong. If I’m maximizing my health potential, everything in my life runs more smoothly–fewer things go wrong with my health. When something does go wrong, it’s because it’s something beyond my reasonable control. Even then my decisions pay off though, because whatever it is I need is less risky, stressful, and more likely to be effective when the rest of me is being taken care of well.
To me, the person looking at their decisions through these scopes, and following through with them is doing something to fix things. And this individual is experiencing all of these benefits and even more themselves!
This isn’t a health care specific observation. The world seems to run in patterns. It’s either because the world works in patterns or because our brains all work on the same basic principles so we can’t help but repeat things. The pattern here is that there is an element of individual focus that can have enormous impact on any system. Have you noticed this about personal finances? About upkeep with your car? About playing a sport? About saving our natural resources? In any of these situations, paying attention to daily decisions to maximize your potential consistently improves your circumstances, and in most cases also inevitably improves other peoples’.
The hardest thing us to face is that inevitably there will still be failure, and end of sorts. Inevitable failure is the best excuse for not trying in the first place. Not to be morose, but the healthiest decisions will still end in death. People love to talk about the marathon runner who died of a heart attack as proof that you should do whatever you want. This is an unfortunately narrow-sighted, or short-term perspective. I consider that that same runner would have had that heart attack along with other issues years before had he or she not made good decisions. I also consider that perhaps this was a marathon runner with a cocaine habit–we’re not perfect.
Think of the argument against running in this case as a scope to closely focused on one aspect of a person, in other words. It’s definitely not proof that ignoring your daily decisions to take responsibility and improve your circumstances will lead to failure. It’s also ignoring all the before-mentioned benefits to self and others of taking care of oneself. Seeing the flaws in these scopes makes the inevitability of the runner’s demise a matter of perspective (to narrow), and suggests that applying this in our own lives is similarly narrow.
I’m not sure why people conclude this. Maybe it’s our instinct to see cause and effect because two things are closely associated somehow? Perhaps it involves the fact that some people love to see the underdog win, or the claims refuted–like not wanting to do something when you’re a kid. There’s a part of us that wants to give in and do nothing, so we narrow our view to conclusions like the one above. But had I told you a cocaine addict had a heart attack and died, the same people would also nod as say, “I told you so.” But as above, what if they are the same person? Now what do people say?
So I’ll generalize this scope discussion to a familiar pattern. Cocaine is a “tree” and marathon running is a “tree” in the “forest” that is (was) our deceased runner. The greater your ability to keep the forest in mind when making conclusions, the more likely you are to make good ones, and see the flaws in narrow-sighted conclusions. I suspect laziness or inability or ignorance might all lead us to make narrow conclusions. I don’t know exactly what convinces some people to broaden their scope, while others stay irretrievably tunneled. However, I do know that I’m convinced it’s worth stepping back and keeping at least part of yourself looking at the forest.
Hopefully we see that the forest includes the caveats. The more we think about everything all at once as best we can, the closer we get to taking care of ourselves and through that others. That’s were the “middle ground” people talk about it: a place where your pendulum swings in the middle of everything, thus maximizing the joys of life for everyone in the limited world we live in.
As for the Assissi quote, I’ll make one more reflection. The more I’ve stopped to consider all of the scopes of my decisions, the more I’ve managed to broaden my view to keep the forest in mind as well as the trees, the better I’ve gotten at seeing what I can change and that which I cannot. It’s a peaceful place to be when you know that beyond a certain limit you cannot change things, nor should you. In a sense, this pattern of thinking gives you the wisdom to know the difference.
Hope this “Doctorine” of sorts helps you find that peace of mind from this piece of a Doctor’s Mind…
